
| Special Education |
| BLOGS |
| SDCOE |
| Joe Schwartzberg North Coastal Consortium for Special Education |
| More money for lawyers? School districts consider countywide alliance By: DAVID FRIED North County Times February 9, 2005 Local education officials have proposed forming a countywide alliance that would help school districts defend themselves in some special-education battles that can cost districts hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees and special services. The alliance, similar to one Orange County school districts formed last fall, would review special-education disputes between districts and parents and help cover legal costs in cases that could set a precedent for what is required of school districts. Joe Schwartzberg proposed the idea and serves as director of the North Coastal Consortium for Special Education, which represents 14 local districts. He said districts usually settle special-education lawsuits because they're too costly to fight, even when the district has a strong case. "We're not trying to create a war chest," Schwartzberg said, adding that most legal disputes would still be the responsibility of individual districts. "This is a very principled approach to trying to make more informed decisions." Under Schwartzberg's proposal, districts in the county would contribute 50 cents for each student in their schools, which he estimates would give the alliance $222,500 to work with annually. Along with helping offset legal costs, the money could be used for training and other programs in cases where rulings came in against the districts. Although joining the coalition would require a formal vote by each of the county's 42 school boards, Schwartzberg said more than half of the districts have already expressed their interest. Some parents, special education attorneys and advocates may not take kindly to the idea, however. Michael Cochrane, an attorney who has handled several special-education complaints against school districts in the county, said parents may feel that the districts are trying to gang up against them. "My concern is that this portends a more aggressive approach by school districts where they'll want to take everything to a hearing," Cochrane said, adding that the possibility of a protracted legal battle could discourage parents from fighting for their children's education. But Barbara Groth, a trustee of the San Dieguito Union High School District, discounts the notion that an alliance would amount to ganging up on parents. "This is 42 districts trying not to duplicate labor," Groth said. "Parents should be advocating for their child. But parents aren't responsible for every child's welfare in our district, and board members are and the administration is." Schwartzberg estimated that legal fees for special education disputes can cost a district up to $100,000 for each case, and even more if they lose and are required to pay attorneys' fees for the parents suing the district. In about 90 percent of cases, anticipated legal costs often push districts to settle with parents, even when they believe they have followed the letter of the law, which requires them to provide a "free and appropriate education" to special education students, Schwartzberg said. Cases arise when parents disagree with districts over what is appropriate for their child. Parent demands can range from special counseling to paying for treatment in expensive residential facilities and covering families' travel expenses. Giving into those demands can set a dangerous precedent as well, school officials say. "Sometimes you just can't settle," Groth said. "Because it establishes an atmosphere where, if the district gets a reputation for settling easily, then it kind of sets itself up to have it happen more frequently, and that's not a good use of tax dollars. Details of each district's settlement agreements are kept confidential. But Cochrane said he believes school districts only settle when they believe they can't win a case and willingly jump into legal battles when they believe they're right, no matter the expense. "Because, in my experience, putting a parent in his or her place is much more important than money for a school district," Cochrane said. |
| Claudia Houston paragraph 6 paragraph 18, line 27 and contd. on next page "Mr. Shinoff's client, NCCSE Director Schwartzberg, was well aware of the fraud. He had funded the lawyers who appeared in the due process hearings that Mr. Shinoff denied ever occurred. And he monitored our litigation against EUSD. "Thus, Mr. Gill and Mr. Shinoff and NCCSE knowingly withheld documents from the court in USDC 00/CV/2475 IEG that would have resolved the exhaustion issue 5 years ago." paragraph 20 24 31 |
| Special Education |