February 14, 2005
To: Ray Artiano, Daniel Shinoff and Jeffery Morris
From: Maura Larkins

We’ve stuck to your Plan A script for four years now in this case, and I just want
to make sure that’s what you want to continue to do.  I’m happy with Plan A
because it has enabled me to learn so much and become involved in a bigger
world than when I was in my classroom.  That world keeps getting bigger and
more interesting, so I’m not entirely averse  to continuing in this manner.

On the other hand, I am, and always have been, very concerned about the
children in Chula Vista, and the teachers who are caught in a web of lies.  This
situation will be resolved one day, when the truth is exposed.  I think it would
benefit the children, teachers, and your clients if you would change to Plan B.  
We could work together to find a solution to this problem.  Why don’t we get a
mediator who will help us evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of our
respective positions, and agree on a plan that offers each of us the best that
we can hope to get from this case?

I am leaving on vacation shortly, so I plan to file my DOES motion before I go.  If
you want to get this case over with, please give me a call today.  

Letter to Ray Artiano re Plan B
February 14, 2005
Maura Larkins v.
Richard Werlin and CTA

with Judge Nevitt
BLOGS
SD Education Report
BLOG
Education and the
Culture Wars Blog
San Diego
Education Report
Home
Education Reform
Home
Larkins case summary
Site Map
Case Timeline
Free Speech
Team Success
Ethics in gov't
Defamation Suit
Cheryl Cox Games
Free Speech
Success
Retaliation
Coverups
Conflicts of interest
Federal Judges
College presidents
Highest paid
Gov't eavesdropping
Typical abuse by teachers
ADD at Olympics
African Am Ed
Bullies in Schools
Fixing Education
Peters case in Vista
Schools and violence
Fred Kamper case
Kids bullying kids:
Jeremiah Lasater case
Bullies are popular
Lawyers
Stutz Artiano Shinoff &
Holtz v. Maura Larkins
Stutz' First Amended
Complaint
Elizabeth Schulman
appeal
Elizabeth Schulman and
Larkins case
Rock Star Superintendent
Failure to Think
092704 Nevitt statements
Main Timeline
Motivations CP teachers
Case Summary
2003 Stutz invoices
2002 SDCOE payments
to Daniel Shinoff
2003 part 2 Stutz invoices
Public Records Requests
SDCOE Crosier denial
Payments to Shinoff
Maura Larkins
v. CVESD
Deposition of
Maura Larkins

Judge Ahler OAH
page 89-91

Is Shinoff or Mark
Bresee to blame?
pages 91-94

pages 95-105

pages 105-111

pages 112-123

pages 124-138

pages 138 -






Errata and signature
page
Summary Judgment
Return to "Why this
website"