February 2004 invoice is missing.

Diane Crosier
refused to produce missing invoices.
Education and the Culture
Wars Blog
SD Education Report BLOG
BLOGS
EDUCATION REFORM
Home
CVESD Reporter Blog
San Diego
Education Report
Site Map
092704 Nevitt statements
Main Timeline
Motivations CP teachers
Case Summary
2003 Stutz invoices
2002 SDCOE payments
to Daniel Shinoff
2003 part 2 Stutz invoices
2005 Stutz invoices
Payments to Shinoff
Public Records Requests
SDCOE Crosier denial
Maura Larkins v.
CVESD
Maura Larkins v. Chula Vista Elementary School District
Why was there a balance forward in January 2004?
 Did SDCOE
refuse to pay $2,192.43 in 2003?

Why did SDCOE refuse to produce invoices for 2004 and 2005?
2004 Stutz invoices
2004 Invoices
Stutz Artiano Shinoff & Holtz
Education Reform Report
2003 Pt. 1 Stutz invoices
2002 SDCOE payments
to Daniel Shinoff
San Diego County Office
of Education
2003 Pt 2 Stutz invoices
2004 Stutz invoices
Public records request to
SDCOE
Invoices show amounts charged to SDCOE-JPA by Stutz law firm in the
case of Maura Larkins v. Richard Werlin, et al.
Blog post: San Diego
Union-Tribune tries to
obtain Stutz invoices.
< < <
2005: Did SDCOE pay Stutz law firm for this pleading?
The pleading was fraudulently filed, purportedly on behalf
of Chula Vista Elementary School District.  But CVESD was
not a party in the case, and the true purpose of the
pleading was solely to protect Stutz law firm.  SDCOE has
illegally refused to produce the invoice regarding February
2005, the month the pleading was filed.