) Case No.              GIC 781970
) Judge:                  Hon. William R. Nevitt, Jr.
) Dept:                    64
) Hearing date:     Nov. 4, 2002 8:15













)  COMPLAINT FILED: 1/24/2002
)  TRIAL DATE: 10/22/2004
EX PARTE APPLICATION
BY PLAINTIFF
MAURA LARKINS FOR ORDER
SHORTENING NOTICE FOR HEARING
ON MOTION SEEKING LEAVE OF
COURT TO FILE AN AMENDED
COMPLAINT
I, MAURA LARKINS, Plaintiff in pro per, hereby apply in the above-captioned
matter, for an order, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1005(b),
shortening time for service of the attached notice of motion and supporting
papers seeking leave of court to file an amended complaint, to 16 days.  This
Ex Parte application is supported by the attached declaration of Maura
Larkins, the attached memorandum of points and authorities, a proposed
order shortening time, and Exhibit 3, which is the notice and accompanying
papers of motion seeking leave of court to file an amended complaint.

DATED: October 30, 2002      _____________________________________
                                           Maura Larkins, plaintiff in pro per
OST ex parte Oct. 2002
MAURA LARKINS
Plaintiff in pro per
MAURA LARKINS,            
Plaintiff,                  
                          
   vs.                   
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
                     COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
RICHARD T. WERLIN,              
GRETCHEN DONNDELINGER,
JO ELLEN HAMILTON,              
ALAN R. SMITH,                      
LINDA M. WATSON,                    
MICHELLE LEON-SCHARMACH   
LYNNE MARGARET SALLANS,     
LIBIA S. GIL, Superintendent, as an  
individual,                                    
CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
DISTRICT, a California public entity,
and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,   
Defendants.
___________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
BLOGS
SD Education Report
BLOG
Education and the
Culture Wars Blog
San Diego
Education Report
Home
Education Reform
Home
Larkins case summary
Site Map
Case Timeline
Free Speech
Team Success
Ethics in gov't
Defamation Suit
Cheryl Cox Games
Free Speech
Success
Retaliation
Coverups
Conflicts of interest
Federal Judges
College presidents
Highest paid
Gov't eavesdropping
Typical abuse by teachers
ADD at Olympics
African Am Ed
Bullies in Schools
Fixing Education
Peters case in Vista
Schools and violence
Fred Kamper case
Kids bullying kids:
Jeremiah Lasater case
Bullies are popular
Lawyers
Stutz Artiano Shinoff &
Holtz v. Maura Larkins
Stutz' First Amended
Complaint
Elizabeth Schulman
appeal
Elizabeth Schulman and
Larkins case
Rock Star Superintendent
Failure to Think
092704 Nevitt statements
Main Timeline
Motivations CP teachers
Case Summary
2003 Stutz invoices
2002 SDCOE payments
to Daniel Shinoff
2003 part 2 Stutz invoices
Public Records Requests
SDCOE Crosier denial
Payments to Shinoff
Maura Larkins
v. CVESD
Deposition of
Maura Larkins

Judge Ahler OAH
page 89-91

Is Shinoff or Mark
Bresee to blame?
pages 91-94

pages 95-105

pages 105-111

pages 112-123

pages 124-138

pages 138 -






Errata and signature
page
Summary Judgment
Return to "Why this
website"
Maura Larkins v.
Richard Werlin and CTA

with Judge Nevitt