February 2, 2005                
To Whom It May Concern
From:         Maura Larkins                                        

At an ex parte hearing yesterday, Kelly Angell confirmed what I have long
suspected: the CVESD Board of Education promised to pay for its lawyers’
legal bills if the lawyers got sued by me for violating the law in my case.

Those legal bills have started.  When will the bills end?  When Patrick Judd,
Larry Cunningham, and Pamela Smith decide to quit raiding the taxpayers’
pocketbooks to pay for lawyers who help them violate the law.
Indemnity admission by Kelly Angell
at ex parte February 2, 2005
Maura Larkins v.
Richard Werlin and CTA

with Judge Nevitt
BLOGS
SD Education Report
BLOG
Education and the
Culture Wars Blog
San Diego
Education Report
Home
Education Reform
Home
Larkins case summary
Site Map
Case Timeline
Free Speech
Team Success
Ethics in gov't
Defamation Suit
Cheryl Cox Games
Free Speech
Success
Retaliation
Coverups
Conflicts of interest
Federal Judges
College presidents
Highest paid
Gov't eavesdropping
Typical abuse by teachers
ADD at Olympics
African Am Ed
Bullies in Schools
Fixing Education
Peters case in Vista
Schools and violence
Fred Kamper case
Kids bullying kids:
Jeremiah Lasater case
Bullies are popular
Lawyers
Stutz Artiano Shinoff &
Holtz v. Maura Larkins
Stutz' First Amended
Complaint
Elizabeth Schulman
appeal
Elizabeth Schulman and
Larkins case
Rock Star Superintendent
Failure to Think
092704 Nevitt statements
Main Timeline
Motivations CP teachers
Case Summary
2003 Stutz invoices
2002 SDCOE payments
to Daniel Shinoff
2003 part 2 Stutz invoices
Public Records Requests
SDCOE Crosier denial
Payments to Shinoff
Maura Larkins
v. CVESD
Deposition of
Maura Larkins

Judge Ahler OAH
page 89-91

Is Shinoff or Mark
Bresee to blame?
pages 91-94

pages 95-105

pages 105-111

pages 112-123

pages 124-138

pages 138 -






Errata and signature
page
Summary Judgment
Return to "Why this
website"