The current CVESD Superintendent,
Lowell Billings, was one of the eleven
principals who worked at the school
during the past eleven years.  Billings
was so weak (or so uninterested) that he
went along with whatever these teachers
wanted.    Despite this, Billings accepted
an award from the California Association
of Bilingual Educators in 2007.  Perhaps
the award is best explained by the fact
that Bertha Lopez, a board member of
CABE, is also a board member of
CVESD.  CVESD board members
apparently appreciate the way Lowell
Billings has kept quiet about their
wrongdoing.
Here is yet another "inappropriate"
document.  The teachers who controlled
the school felt they could not tolerate
this attitude.
Many Castle Park Elementary
teachers were livid when the
idea of a bilingual program
was introduced during the
1993-4 school year.  

1. Staff discussions were so out of control
that James Barron Stark was hired to teach
the teachers how to conduct a staff
meeting without yelling.  

Unfortunately, the angry teachers just became
passive aggressive instead of openly
aggressive.  They took out their anger on
bilingual teachers and bilingual kids.  

2. During the following six years, these
angry teachers instigated the dismissals of
two bilingual teachers in a school with only
four bilingual positions.  

3. Angry teachers also refused to team
with bilingual teachers.
 

Luci Fowers was the sole English-only teacher
who was willing to team.  

Kathy Bingham, Nikki Perez, Jo Ellen Hamilton,
Linda Watson and Richard Denmon all
refused.  As a result, bilingual students were
spending 100% of their academic instruction in
classes that were 100% Hispanic.  When I
mentioned the Civil Rights Act to my grade
level colleagues and the principal, Linda
Watson laughed, making clear that she
thought that I was being silly, and the Civil
Rights Act was of no importance at Castle Park
Elementary.  Later someone overheard the
principal telling Richard Denmon that he had
to team.  He told her clearly that his grade
level would not do it, and she dropped the
subject.

When Rae Correira came to the school to try
to initiate teaming, she was transferred by
Richard Werlin from her position at the district.

Maura Larkins' students were damaged when
she was removed in the middle of the year and
replaced by a substitute who hadn't even done
her student teaching and didn't speak Spanish.

(see bilingual program below)
A report about the bilingual education debate

San Diego Union-Tribune
December 21, 1997

THE BILINGUAL DEBATE
Two Schools of Thought
Latinos divided over merits of dual-language instruction.
By Ed Mendel, Staff Writer

It's only about 100 miles between the two schools on Interstate 5. But when it comes to bilingual education,
they are worlds apart.

Taft Elementary School in Santa Ana is the home of Gloria Matta Tuchman, a first-grade teacher. She and
businessman Ron Unz are co-leaders of an initiative that seeks to replace bilingual education with a
one-year program, taught predominantly in English, that Taft has used for years.

Los Altos Elementary School on Otay Mesa is the home of Edward "Lalo" Aceves, a principal. He scrapped
an English-immersion program four years ago, replacing it with a bilingual program that teaches children
in their native languages for four to seven years as they learn English.

The two educators and their schools illustrate how Latinos, who once pushed for bilingual education as a
civil right, are now deeply divided over the question of whether young students who speak little or no
English should be taught for years in Spanish or be prodded to learn English quickly.

"It's nothing new," Tuchman said of her method. "It isn't revolutionary. It isn't magic. It's just good sense and
good teaching."

The teachers at Taft use English, backed by pictures and gestures, while teaching young students whose
skills in English are limited. Teachers sometimes use a few words in the students' native language. The
students are usually transferred to regular mainstream classes after a year.

In bilingual education, students are taught in their native language and
gradually introduced to English. They often remain in bilingual education four to seven years before all of
their classes are presented in English.

"It works," said Aceves. "The kids are confident about the work. They are proud of their heritage. We are not
trying to fragment our society. We are trying to build this country."

While talking about the educational merit of their methods, Tuchman and Aceves can both cite academic
research and anecdotes about the successes of individual students. But the lack of conclusive evidence
makes the debate over bilingual education a difficult one.

Latinos may be only about 15 percent of the voters who will decide the fate of the initiative, headed for the
ballot in June. Yet the direct impact of bilingual education falls mainly on Latinos, whose mass migration
has changed the face of California.

Latinos moved past whites this year to become the largest racial group in California's public schools --
about 2.2 million, or nearly 40 percent of the 5.6 million students in kindergarten through high school.

Half of the Latino students speak little or no English and are classified, in the language of the state
bureaucracy, as limited English proficient. As a result, Latinos are about 80 percent of the 1.4 million
California students who are eligible for bilingual education.

California schools have to deal with more than just Spanish-speaking
children. The San Diego Unified School District, for instance, must deal with students who speak about 50
different languages. But the vast majority of limited-English students are those who speak Spanish.

Tale of two schools

Reaction to the Latino migration went in dramatically different directions at Taft Elementary, located in the
heart of conservative Orange County, and Los Altos Elementary, where Tijuana's seaside bull ring can be
seen from the schoolyard.

"They kept saying, `They are coming, they are coming,' " recalled Taft's Tuchman. "I said, `They are already
here, and we better have something in place before the state education department comes down here and
tells us what to do.' "

A former principal at Taft wanted to switch from the one-year English program, known as sheltered
immersion, to bilingual education in 1985. Tuchman opposed the change and was reprimanded for
resisting implementation of the new policy, which ended up being dropped after parents protested.

Tuchman moved on from the victory at her school. As a member of the board of the nearby Tustin Unified
School District, she helped get a federal grant for an alternative to bilingual education in 1987, when the
district had only 200 children with limited English skills.

Now the Tustin district has more than 4,000 children with limited English skills. All of them go through
sheltered immersion programs such as the ones Tuchman and her colleagues use at Taft in the Santa
Ana Unified School District.

Tuchman took her fight against bilingual education to Sacramento in 1987, testifying against the renewal of
the state bilingual education law.

"I personally feel that bilingual education has failed a whole generation of Hispanic children, not only in this
state but in the whole country," said Tuchman, who ran unsuccessfully for state superintendent of public
instruction in 1994.

"They are not learning English. They are not staying in school. They are not graduating from high school."

But while Taft and Tustin were going one way, most of the public schools in California have been going the
other. After Aceves came to Los Altos, he installed a bilingual education program in 1993 to replace what
he says was a failed English immersion plan modeled after a program in Texas.

Just as Tuchman has helped spread English immersion, Aceves has done the same for bilingual
education. He helped set up bilingual programs at three other schools in the Chula Vista Elementary
School District, where he has worked for 22 years.

"Our program is to build biliteracy," said Aceves, who recently received a doctorate from SDSU in bilingual
education. "That is our end product."


Los Altos is not yet teaching Spanish or another second language to
students who already speak English and make up about 55 percent of the 500-member student body. But
that could be on the way.

The Chula Vista district board not only backs bilingual education, but passed a resolution in October
supporting "multiliteracy" and the teaching of a second language to children who speak English.

Chula Vista, the largest elementary district in the state with 21,400
students, has been undergoing a rapid transformation. Two-thirds of the students are minorities, and a
third of them speak limited English.
When Aceves arrived at Los Altos, all of the teachers were white. Now many of the 31 teachers are
minorities and nearly half of the total staff provide instruction in Spanish. As Latinos take jobs once held by
whites, Aceves bluntly acknowledged that there may be some underground resentment among the staff.

"If I were to leave tomorrow, they would probably burn a cross in front of the school," he joked.

Learning in two languages

Step inside the Los Altos school, located on a low hill in San Diego
overlooking Tijuana, and you find what Aceves calls a "late-exit
transitional" bilingual education program.

Students with limited English, nearly half of the total enrollment, receive most of their instruction from
teachers who speak Spanish and use Spanish language textbooks.

But starting in kindergarten, when they mix with English-speaking children, the students are gradually
taught in English for part of the day.

By the fourth grade, a student's daily rotation among subjects includes 1 1/2 to two hours of instruction in
English. It usually takes four to seven years before students are receiving all of their instruction in English.

After kindergarten, students are tested, and their parents are asked to
decide whether the child should take full or modified bilingual programs or English only.

Like a doctor advising a patient, Aceves said, the school recommends to parents that their children take the
bilingual program. He said only four or five a year opt for English only.

Aceves is a critic of the sheltered immersion programs. Such programs would be imposed on all students
by the initiative -- unless parents can convince school officials there is the need for a waiver for their child.

He said young students who are taught to speak English can quickly seem to become fluent, but have
trouble thinking in their new language later on. He said the problem often begins to appear at about the
third grade.

"Kids can fool you," said Aceves. "But when you start getting into the academics, it's more difficult to think at
a second level."

When Los Altos experimented with English immersion programs from 1991 to 1993, reading test scores
showed no improvement and math scores dropped slightly.

But since the bilingual program began in 1993, reading and math scores at Los Altos have improved,
particularly for students taking a test in Spanish known as the Aprenda.

The man who was the district assistant superintendent for instruction when Los Altos switched back to
bilingual education said there were several reasons for the change.

"I think it's fair to say that the largest push came from a compliance
mandate from the state," said Lowell Billings, now the district business manager. "I am also aware there
were concerns about not the immediate impact, but the long-term impact of cognitive disorders and delays."

Aceves said a teacher recently remarked that a young student named Frankie had quickly become fluent in
English, perhaps making him ready to leave the bilingual program. Aceves said the youth needed more
time.

"Tuchman may have a bunch of Frankies, who are sharp kids," said Aceves. "They will talk to you in either
language."

Arguments for immersion

Tuchman rolled her eyes and smiled when asked if there was evidence that students at Taft, after
emerging from the immersion program, began to encounter learning difficulties around the third grade.

"We monitor their progress," said Tuchman. "We get the parents involved. I don't see that their minds are
declining."

The Taft principal, Bill Hart, said he sees no evidence that problems often begin developing in subsequent
grades. But if they do, he said, the school can offer support in the native language after students leave the
immersion program.

Hart does not take sides in the dispute over bilingual education. In his
view, the key is dedicated teachers, who can make either immersion or bilingual education work if they
strongly believe in it.

"All this stuff is highly emotional," said Hart. "All you are getting
really is opinion. There are no strong numbers pointing to one being better than the other."

Taft has some of the top test scores in its district, and at times a
waiting list of parents who want to enroll their children. Hart gives all
the credit to a skillful group of teachers in the school with 1,200
students, about 75 percent Latino.

Tuchman is part of a close-knit group of teachers who have been at Taft for years. The teachers not only
rejected bilingual education -- and received a state waiver to embark on the English immersion program --
but also the "whole language" method of teaching reading pushed by the state a decade ago.

Hart said the teachers concluded after a few months that the use of
interesting stories to capture the attention of students was not enough. The teachers asked to switch back
to phonics-based instruction and sounding out words.

Even the Taft school building bears the stamp of the strong-willed
teachers. At their request, the interior of the building is a large open
space without the traditional walls between class areas.

Tuchman is the smoothly practiced professional as she works with a class of about 15 students, smartly
dressed in the school uniform of dark blue pants and skirts and white shirts and blouses.

Pointing to words and pictures on the wall, Tuchman moves through a series of drills on basic things: the
days of the week, months of the year, and the four seasons. She gets students to say the words by
constantly asking questions, usually of the whole class, but sometimes of individuals.

In one drill, she goes through the coins commonly found in pocket change -- penny, nickel, dime and
quarter -- weaving in the words, the numbers and little historical lessons about the presidents depicted on
each of the four coins.

There is a remarkable moment when the first-graders, who received training in English in kindergarten,
seem to be far enough along to grasp a pun or word play based on their new language.

Tuchman points to a drawing and asks: "Do you know what fog is?"

"Like a frog," a youngster wisecracks, drawing a laugh from his classmates. Tuchman smiles and
explains, "Clouds come down and then you can't see too good."

Political issues

As with their preferred methods of teaching, Tuchman and Aceves have very different ways of handling the
political question of what impact bilingual education has on society. Much of the early opposition to
bilingual education warned that the United States would become another Canada, a divided society
speaking two different languages.

In fact, a group that wants to preserve a one-language culture, English First, says the initiative is already
giving new momentum to legislation in Congress that would repeal federal bilingual education laws.

"I'm hearing from more congressmen that we have to do something about bilingual education," said Jim
Boulet Jr., English First executive
director. "So I am cautiously optimistic that we might be able to kill this program."

Tuchman politely declines to be drawn into a discussion about the politics of bilingual education. In her
view, bilingual education hurts Latino students by keeping them segregated from other students for years,
contributing to low test scores and high dropout rates -- and, in the end, dimming their chances of
advancement in life.

Her own experience and recent polls tell her that most Latino parents want their children to be taught
English quickly. A statewide Field Poll found that the initiative is supported by 69 percent of all voters and 66
percent of Latinos.

"I see it as an English literacy issue -- not as a racial issue, not as an
assimilation issue, not as a diversity issue," said Tuchman.

With Aceves, a discussion of bilingual education is steeped in social
issues and ethnic consciousness. He said activists in the 1960s used to refer to Latinos like Tuchman,
who made it into the middle-class mainstream in Orange County, as "vendidos," people who sold out their
culture.

"Basically, it boils down to a political hotbed," said Aceves. "It's a very racial issue. People of the majority of
the culture think we should all speak English. I don't disagree. I think we should all be biliterate."

Aceves feels the strong pull of Mexico. Sometimes he goes up on the roof of the school to retrieve a ball
from the playground. He can see Tijuana and the high-rises of downtown San Diego, two cities so near yet
so far apart.

"I'm sitting here and you can see Tijuana, and we can't even talk to them," said Aceves.

At Taft in Santa Ana, the veteran principal knows that Latino parents, who must give permission for their
children to be placed in the immersion program, have a strong attachment to their culture and ethnic
identity. But his prescription is different from the one issued by Aceves.

"I tell them, `If you work at home on language and customs of the old country and let us teach in English, we
will develop a student who is fluent in both arenas,' " Hart said. "I have never yet had a parent turn me down."
The small group of governing teachers,
which consisted of one lower-grade
clique and one upper-grade clique,
didn't always agree among themselves
about academic issues.  But they
always agreed about one thing: no one
from outside the ruling group was
allowed to have any input into how the
school was run.
What motivated some teachers at Castle Park
Elementary to get rid of Maura Larkins?

There was more than one reason.
Maura Larkins was an enthusiastic supporter
of the Comer program, a model of
decision-making in which everyone is
theoretically allowed to speak, but voting is
discouraged.

The problem started when a majority of
teachers voted to end the "Kingdoms"
cross-age support groups, but a small group
of teachers who controlled the principal and
the site council countermanded the decision.

Larkins worked very hard to initiate and
maintain the Kingdoms program, creating,
with the help of one other person, 500 name
tags for the children for the first day.  The
plan of the chairman of the "Peace
Committee," which was in charge of
Kingdoms, was to read 500 names out loud
on the first morning of the program, while
500 students from kindergarten through
sixth grade sat or stood on the asphalt
playground.   

Larkins was concerned that the Comer
program was being used in a way that
subverted its purpose, allowing arbitrary
decisions by the "SPMT," or site council,
without input from parents, teachers or
students.  Also, SPMT members had been
appointed rather than elected, a violation of
California law.

Larkins liked Kingdoms, but disliked the
abuse of the Comer program, which had cost
$20,000 for training.

Larkins Kingdoms program be discussed
openly.  When Larkins tried to open a
discussion by creating the program
evaluation sheet below, the teachers who
controlled the school became angry.
The Comer program
Reason #1
Teacher Kathy Bingham demanded that
principal Gretchen Donndelinger summon
Maura Larkins to the office and defend
herself.  The principal, as usual, did exactly
as she was directed, including rushing to the
teachers lounge and writing a notice on the
white board telling teachers NOT to respond
to the document.

Several other independent-minded staff
members were ejected from Castle Park
Elementary by the controlling group,
including Heather Smith, Heather Coman,
and Luci Fowers.  The group chewed up and
spit out a long list of principals, as well.  The
school has had eleven principals in the past
eleven years.
Reason #2
Bilingual Program
Teachers who wrote documents like
this one were not tolerated
Bilingual Program contd.
*  *  *
BLOGS
SD Education Report
BLOG
Education and the
Culture Wars Blog
San Diego
Education Report
Home
Education Reform
Home
Larkins case summary
Site Map
Case Timeline
Free Speech
Team Success
Ethics in gov't
Defamation Suit
Cheryl Cox Games
Free Speech
Success
Retaliation
Coverups
Conflicts of interest
Federal Judges
College presidents
Highest paid
Gov't eavesdropping
Typical abuse by teachers
ADD at Olympics
African Am Ed
Bullies in Schools
Fixing Education
Peters case in Vista
Schools and violence
Fred Kamper case
Kids bullying kids:
Jeremiah Lasater case
Bullies are popular
Lawyers
Stutz Artiano Shinoff &
Holtz v. Maura Larkins
Stutz' First Amended
Complaint
Elizabeth Schulman
appeal
Elizabeth Schulman and
Larkins case
Rock Star Superintendent
Failure to Think
092704 Nevitt statements
Main Timeline
Motivations CP teachers
Case Summary
2003 Stutz invoices
2002 SDCOE payments
to Daniel Shinoff
2003 part 2 Stutz invoices
Public Records Requests
SDCOE Crosier denial
Payments to Shinoff
Maura Larkins
v. CVESD
Deposition of
Maura Larkins

Judge Ahler OAH
page 89-91

Is Shinoff or Mark
Bresee to blame?
pages 91-94

pages 95-105

pages 105-111

pages 112-123

pages 124-138

pages 138 -






Errata and signature
page
Summary Judgment
Return to "Why this
website"